The security guards board for additional bombay and thana district claimed that the exemption requests were more likely to be turned down on that floor on their own since the act did not consider the provision of an exemption in favor of a security organization. In addition, he argued that the high court erred in security company that the packages had been rejected on the basis of any policy choice. After receiving all the attention their package deserved, they were denied. If a policy choice had to be made, it would have been made after carefully considering each application for exception and concluding that none of them deserved to be approved. The statute, according to Shri Soli Sorabji and other learned counsel who followed him, was only meant to regulate and improve working conditions for security guards; it did not take the organization system as a whole into consideration.
The authorities have a duty to provide the necessary exemption whenever the actual carrier conditions are better than those that were recommended in the program so that the personnel can benefit from the real carrier conditions. According to them, this outcome resulted from a reading of the statute, particularly sections 22 and 23. Additionally, it was urged that the high court's conclusion that the exemption requests had been denied due to a policy choice rather than on the basis of merit was correct. We can also keep in mind the opposing arguments on the terms of the Maharashtra Private Safety Guards Act, as stated in the preamble to the ordinance that preceded the act.
The governor of Maharashtra is convinced that circumstances exist that require him to act immediately to make a law governing the employment of private security guards employed in factories and establishments within the state of Maharashtra and for improving provision for their terms and conditions of employment and welfare, through the status quo of a board thereto, and for matters related thereto. The act's full title is "an act for regulating the employment of personal security guards employed in factories and establishments within the country of Maharashtra and for improving provisions for their terms and conditions of employment and welfare, through the established order of a board accordingly, and for topics related thereto." It applies to "people who work as security guards in any manufacturing facility or established order, however. continue reading